|
NHTSA Crash Test Results
|
|
|
|
|
Frontal Crash:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
Driver
|
|
|
|
Passenger
|
|
|
|
Side Crash:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
Front Seat
|
Not Tested
|
|
|
Rear Seat
|
Not Tested
|
|
|
Rollover Resistance:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
Rollover Resistance
|
Not Tested
|
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) provides 3
different ratings -
full-width frontal crash test
,
side impact crash test
, and
rollover resistance
. The frontal crash test indicates how
well the safety features and restraints
will protect an occupant in a head-on
collision. The side-impact test conveys
the chance of a severe chest injury,
while the rollover resistance rating
estimates the risk of rolling over in a
single vehicle crash.
Go to
NHTSA
to learn more about these results.
|
|
IIHS Crash Test Results
|
|
|
|
|
IIHS Crash Test Results for the
1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON are not available in CARFAX Safety
& Reliability Ratings.
|
|
|
Low-Speed Damage Repair
|
|
|
|
|
Front Crash
Description:
|
Front Crash Cost:
|
|
Front into flat barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Front into angle barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Rear Crash
Description:
|
Rear Crash Cost:
|
|
Rear into flat barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Rear into pole
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Average Damage Per
Test
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety (IIHS) conducts four 5
mph crash tests to assess bumper
performance. These results
convey how well this
1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON
bumpers will protect the car
body from damage in low-speed
collisions.
Low-speed damage repair
costs are obtained from
the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety,
Highway Loss Data
Institute.
|
|
|
Injury, Collision, & Theft
Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
Index:
|
Score:
|
Rating:
|
|
Injury Index
|
77
|
Better than average
|
|
Collision Index
|
75
|
Better than average
|
|
Theft Index
|
64
|
Average
|
|
These scores are stated
in relative terms, with
100 being the average
for all cars in each
category. Scores greater
than 100 represent
higher risk in each
category. For example,
an injury indicator
score of 122 means that
a passenger in this
model is 22% more likely
to be injured in an
accident.
The injury,
collision, and
theft indicators
for this
1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON
are provided by
the Insurance
Institute for
Highway Safety,
Highway Loss
Data Institute.
Learn
more
about these
results.
|
|
|
Safety Recalls
|
|
|
|
|
NHTSA Safety Recalls:
|
|
Important: The following recalls were issued for the
1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON
by the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA).
To find out if a specific
1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON
still has open recalls that require repair, CARFAX recommends contacting an
authorized dealership
for more information.
|
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
948,492
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
01I007000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
SUSPENSION:I-BEAM:SOLID:FRONT SPRING:COIL
|
|
Description:
|
This is not a safety recall in accordance with the Safety Act. However, it is deemed a safety improvement campaign by the agency. Vehicle Description: 1995-1998 Ford Windstar minivans. The front coil springs could potentially fracture due to corrosion. Some tires have deflated due to contact with a broken spring. Ford is extending the warranty for front coil spring replacement to a total of 10 years of service from the warranty start date, with unlimited mileage. This coverage is automatically transferred to subsequent owners at no charge. If either front coil spring fractures during the coverage period noted above, the dealer will replace both springs at no charge to the owner.
|
|
Recall date:
|
04-19-2002
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
250,283
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
02V101000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
BRAKES:HYDRAULIC:LINES:FITTINGS
|
|
Description:
|
On certain minivans sold or currently registered in the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. During assembly, some brake lines were installed in a twisted position, causing contact with the dash panel insulator above the catalytic converter. This contact could abrade the brake line corrosion protection, consequently, salt or water absorbed in the dash panel insulator would promote corrosion. This corrosion could ultimately lead to a leak in the brake line. Leakage of brake fluid will result in brake light activation. Extended stopping distance could also result, increasing the risk of a crash. Dealers will inspect the brake line for corrosion and clearance conditions. A brake line that is not corroded will be repositioned. A brake line that is corroded or leaking will be replaced with a nylon coated brake line and secured using three retaining clips to assure clearance from the insulator. Owner notification began May 10, 2002. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332.
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
100,000
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
96V086000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
POWER TRAIN:TRANSMISSION:AUTOMATIC
|
|
Description:
|
THE PARK PAWL SHAFT WAS IMPROPERLY POSITIONED WHEN THE ROLL PIN THAT RETAINS IT WAS INSTALLED DURING TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY. IF THE SHAFT WAS NOT PROPERLY POSITIONED, THE ROLL PIN MAY NOT HAVE LINED UP WITH THE GROOVE IN THE SHAFT AND HAVE BEEN CRUSHED AT ASSEMBLY. ALSO, A BURR COULD HAVE BEEN RAISED ON THE SHAFT. THIS COULD RESULT IN THE PARK PAWL OCCASIONALLY NOT ENGAGING WHEN THE TRANSMISSION SELECTOR LEVER IS PLACED IN THE PARK POSITION. THIS COULD RESULT IN THE VEHICLE ROLLING AS IF IN NEUTRAL IF THE VEHICLE OPERATOR DOES NOT APPLY THE PARKING BRAKE. DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE PARK PAWL SHAFT ROLL PIN. IF THE ROLL PIN IS DAMAGED, BOTH THE ROLL PIN AND THE PARK PAWL SHAFT WILL BE REPLACED. IN ADDITION, OWNERS WILL BE REMINDED TO FULLY APPLY THE PARKING BRAKE, IN ADDITION TO PLACING THE TRANSMISSION IN PARK.
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
200
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
96V114000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
INTERIOR SYSTEMS:SEAT TRACKS AND ANCHORS
|
|
Description:
|
THE FOUR FASTENERS SECURING THE DRIVER'S SEAT TO THE FLOORPAN WERE NOT TORQUED TO PROPER SPECIFICATIONS. THE DRIVER'S SEAT MAY NOT PROPERLY HOLD IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE ACCIDENT RESULTING IN PERSONAL INJURY TO THE OCCUPANT. DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE DRIVER'S SEAT FASTENERS AND RETORQUE TO PROPER SPECIFICATIONS.
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
40,000
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
96V166000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
POWER TRAIN:TRANSMISSION:AUTOMATIC:INDICATOR:LEVER:GEAR
|
|
Description:
|
The park pawl abutment bracket has a sharp edge which can cause the parking pawl to hang up and not engage the park gear. This would allow the vehicle to move even though the gear shift indicator shows that the vehicle is in park. Unintended and unexpected vehicle movement can result in personal injury and property damage. Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, replace the park pawl abutment bracket.
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
769,000
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
97V180000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
STRUCTURE:HOOD ASSEMBLY
|
|
Description:
|
Vehicle Description: Passenger vehicles and mini vans. Tearing of the bond between the inner and outer hood panels during minor front end collisions can result in a gap at the leading edge of the hood. Air forced between the inner and outer panels can produce enough pressure to force the outer panel upward. This condition can result in total separation of the outer hood panel. Dealers will inspect the hood area for any damage along the leading edge of the hood. If there is any evidence of bond separation, the hood will be replaced. If there is no evidence of bond separation, additional adhesive will be applied between the inner and outer hood panels.
|
|
Recall date:
|
Not reported
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
789,723
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
99V147000
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
BRAKES:HYDRAULIC:MASTER CYLINDER:OTHER
|
|
Description:
|
Vehicle Description: Minivans. The brake fluid master cylinder is recessed and oriented in the engine compartment so that the brake fluid warning statement embossed on both the top of the filler cap and the side of the reservoir body are not entirely visible by direct view. These vehicles may not fully comply with requirements of FMVSS No. 135, ""Passenger Car Brake Systems."" Owners will be provided with new labels and installation instructions.
|
|
This 1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON safety recall information was provided by the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety, Highway Data Loss Institute and is derived from the
National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration
list of safety recalls. Please call the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration Auto Safety Hotline at
1-888-DASH-2-DOT (1-888-327-4236) to report safety defects or to obtain information on
cars, trucks, child seats, and highway or traffic safety. CARFAX does not review,
validate or edit the information and statements provided by the National Highway
Traffic and Saftey Administration, which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
J.D. Power Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.D. Power and Associates uses selected highlights from the firm's quality and
customer satisfaction syndicated studies
to create the Power Ratings at the model-level. These ratings and awards are based on
model rankings within each vehicle segment, whereas Power Circle Ratings compare all
models across segments.
All information provided by J.D. Power and Associates is proprietary information owned
by J.D. Power and Associates and is protected by U.S. and international copyright law
and conventions. Reproduction of this information, in whole or in part, by any means
is prohibited without the express written consent of J.D. Power and Associates, other
than printing copies of the JDPA content by site visitors for their personal use. J.D.
Power and Associates® is a registered trademark of J.D. Power and Associates.
|
|
|
|
Identifix Reliability Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
Category:
|
Comments:
|
Rating:
|
|
Engine
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Transmission & Driveline
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Steering & Suspension
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Brakes
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Heating & Air Conditioning
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Starting & Charging
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Accessories
|
No data from source
|
|
|
|
This
1996 FORD WINDSTAR
reliability
information was provided by Identifix.
Identifix is the nation's largest technical
support service for the aftermarket auto repair
industry. CARFAX does not review, validate or edit
the information and statements provided by Identifix,
which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
Original Manufacturer Warranty
|
|
|
|
Coverage:
|
Years/Mileage:
|
|
Basic
|
3 years or 36,000 miles
|
|
Drivetrain
|
3 years or 36,000 miles
|
|
Emissions
|
2 years or 24,000 miles
|
|
Corrosion
|
5 years with Unlimited mileage
|
|
Transferable
|
Transferable: no cost, unlimited owners covered.
|
|
Roadside Assistance
|
Roadside assistance is covered for 3 years or 36,000 miles.
|
|
Safety Belt & Inflatable Restraint
|
Safety belt and inflatable restraint system are covered for 5 years or 50,000 miles.
|
|
Specific Components
|
8 years or 80,000 miles
|
|
Notes:
|
Manufacturer covers emissions components under basic warranty. Emissions coverage may vary by state. Refer to owners manual for specific details. Transferable: no cost, unlimited owners covered. Roadside assistance is covered during basic warranty. Safety belt and inflatable restraint systems are covered for 5 years or 50,000 miles. Adjustments and bulbs are covered (except alignment and wheel balance) after 1 years or 12,000 miles.
|
This 1996 FORD WINDSTAR WAGON warranty information
has been provided by J&L Warranty Pros.
|
|
|
New Car Test Drive Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Last year's champ is still a top contender.
By Ray Thursby, NewCarTestDrive.com
Once again, the Windstar stands at the head of the large minivan list. Despite increased competition, it still delivers a blend of quality, comfort, performance and style that set it apart from the rest. Obviously, alternatives exist. A smaller van or sedan may cost less while carrying as big a load as you require, and a bigger rear-drive van can carry more and pull a heavier trailer. But the Windstar is impressively flexible in capacity, and looks equally at home picking the kids up at school or carrying you to a night on the town. While deficient in a few areas--there's no driver's-side rear door (if that matters to you), rear seat removal is a chore, and the new Chryslers are marginally better when rated on cargo space vs. exterior size--Windstar remains an excellent choice in a very competitive category. |
|
Overview:
|
There's a real struggle going on for supremacy in the minivan world, a battle being fought largely between Ford and Chrysler, with GM currently bringing up the rear. With each new model year, the opponents exert themselves to the utmost to increase performance, comfort, style and utility value without driving prices beyond competitive levels. Chrysler was the first to stake a claim in this field with its 1984 entries. Ford responded with the rear-drive Aerostar a year later, then followed up with the Windstar in 1994. A redesigned Chrysler lineup--Chrysler Town & Country, Plymouth Voyager and Dodge Caravan--made their debut last year. GM answered Ford's Aerostar with the rear-drive Chevy Astro and GMC Safari, then introduced the front-drive Chevy APV, Pontiac Trans Sport and Oldsmobile Silhouette. Import nameplates competing in this arena include the Mazda MPV, Toyota Previa, Nissan Quest--a clone of the Mercury Villager--and the new Honda Odyssey. Lots of choices. In general, the domestic offerings are large minivans, offering more cargo space and spread-out room than the imports while being easier to drive and more maneuverable than full-size vans. Last year, Windstar was the cream of the crop. This year, it faces stronger rivals. Does it still match up?
Read the complete
1996 Ford Windstar LX review
|
|
© 2002 NewCarTestDrive.com
CARFAX does not review, validate or edit the information and statements provided by NewCarTestDrive.com, which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Unauthorized Usage Disclaimer
CARFAX DEPENDS ON ITS SOURCES FOR THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF ITS INFORMATION. THEREFORE,
NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED BY CARFAX OR ITS AGENTS FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THIS REPORT.
CARFAX FURTHER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
SYSTEMATIC RETRIEVAL OF THE CONTENT OR OTHER DATA FROM THIS SITE TO CREATE OR COMPILE,
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A COLLECTION, COMPILATION, DATABASE OR DIRECTORY
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARFAX IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. THE CARFAX SAFETY &
RELIABILITY RATINGS IS SUBJECT TO THE CARFAX.COM
TERMS OF USE.
© 2009 CARFAX, Inc., an R.L. Polk & Co. All rights reserved.
|
Safety:
Reliability:
