|
NHTSA Crash Test Results
|
|
|
|
|
Frontal Crash:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
Driver
|
|
|
|
Passenger
|
|
|
|
Side Crash:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
Front Seat
|
Not Tested
|
|
|
Rear Seat
|
Not Tested
|
|
|
Rollover Resistance:
|
Rating:
|
|
|
Rollover Resistance
|
Not Tested
|
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) provides 3
different ratings -
full-width frontal crash test
,
side impact crash test
, and
rollover resistance
. The frontal crash test indicates how
well the safety features and restraints
will protect an occupant in a head-on
collision. The side-impact test conveys
the chance of a severe chest injury,
while the rollover resistance rating
estimates the risk of rolling over in a
single vehicle crash.
Go to
NHTSA
to learn more about these results.
|
|
IIHS Crash Test Results
|
|
|
|
|
IIHS Crash Test Results for the
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER are not available in CARFAX Safety
& Reliability Ratings.
|
|
|
Low-Speed Damage Repair
|
|
|
|
|
Front Crash
Description:
|
Front Crash Cost:
|
|
Front into flat barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Front into angle barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Rear Crash
Description:
|
Rear Crash Cost:
|
|
Rear into flat barrier
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Rear into pole
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
|
Average Damage Per
Test
|
|
Not tested by IIHS
|
Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety (IIHS) conducts four 5
mph crash tests to assess bumper
performance. These results
convey how well this
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER
bumpers will protect the car
body from damage in low-speed
collisions.
Low-speed damage repair
costs are obtained from
the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety,
Highway Loss Data
Institute.
|
|
|
Injury, Collision, & Theft
Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
Index:
|
Score:
|
Rating:
|
|
Injury Index
|
66
|
Substantially better than average
|
|
Collision Index
|
69
|
Substantially better than average
|
|
Theft Index
|
44
|
Better than average
|
|
These scores are stated
in relative terms, with
100 being the average
for all cars in each
category. Scores greater
than 100 represent
higher risk in each
category. For example,
an injury indicator
score of 122 means that
a passenger in this
model is 22% more likely
to be injured in an
accident.
The injury,
collision, and
theft indicators
for this
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER
are provided by
the Insurance
Institute for
Highway Safety,
Highway Loss
Data Institute.
Learn
more
about these
results.
|
|
|
Safety Recalls
|
|
|
|
|
NHTSA Safety Recalls:
|
|
Important: The following recalls were issued for the
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER
by the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA).
To find out if a specific
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER
still has open recalls that require repair, CARFAX recommends contacting an
authorized dealership
for more information.
|
|
|
Recall date:
|
02-15-2001
|
|
Units potentially affected:
|
394,000
|
|
NHTSA campaign number:
|
00V419002
|
|
Defective part or component:
|
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:STORAGE:TANK ASSEMBLY
|
|
Description:
|
The fuel tank vent hose allows air to vent from the fuel tank during refueling. Cracks have developed in the vent hose. If (1) the fuel tank is overfilled, not allowing excess fuel in the vent hose to flow back into the tank, (2) the vehicle is driven only a short distance after refueling and, (3) there is subsequently significant heating of the fuel tank, the fuel in the tank can expand into the vent hose and leak fuel. Fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source can result in a fire. Dealers will replace the vent hose.
|
|
This 1995 MERCURY VILLAGER safety recall information was provided by the Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety, Highway Data Loss Institute and is derived from the
National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration
list of safety recalls. Please call the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration Auto Safety Hotline at
1-888-DASH-2-DOT (1-888-327-4236) to report safety defects or to obtain information on
cars, trucks, child seats, and highway or traffic safety. CARFAX does not review,
validate or edit the information and statements provided by the National Highway
Traffic and Saftey Administration, which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
J.D. Power Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.D. Power and Associates uses selected highlights from the firm's quality and
customer satisfaction syndicated studies
to create the Power Ratings at the model-level. These ratings and awards are based on
model rankings within each vehicle segment, whereas Power Circle Ratings compare all
models across segments.
All information provided by J.D. Power and Associates is proprietary information owned
by J.D. Power and Associates and is protected by U.S. and international copyright law
and conventions. Reproduction of this information, in whole or in part, by any means
is prohibited without the express written consent of J.D. Power and Associates, other
than printing copies of the JDPA content by site visitors for their personal use. J.D.
Power and Associates® is a registered trademark of J.D. Power and Associates.
|
|
|
|
Identifix Reliability Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
Category:
|
Comments:
|
Rating:
|
|
Engine
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Transmission & Driveline
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Steering & Suspension
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Brakes
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Heating & Air Conditioning
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Starting & Charging
|
No data from source
|
|
|
Accessories
|
No data from source
|
|
|
|
This
1995 MERCURY VILLAGER
reliability
information was provided by Identifix.
Identifix is the nation's largest technical
support service for the aftermarket auto repair
industry. CARFAX does not review, validate or edit
the information and statements provided by Identifix,
which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
Original Manufacturer Warranty
|
|
|
J&L Warranty Pros has no information about the original manufacturer warranty for this 1995 MERCURY VILLAGER.
|
|
New Car Test Drive Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
Looks and luxury in an all-around superb van
By Professional Test Driver, NewCarTestDrive.com
By any standard, the Villager is a serious contender in the minivan market. It looks right, it's built right, and it has the right features to be a comfortable everyday transportation device. And the seating plan has been designed with enough flexibility to deal with a long trip's worth of luggage or a substantial load of cargo. All in all, the Villager returns plenty of value for your money.Though not quite perfect - elimination of the motorized belts and a little more power would bring it much closer - the Villager should be considered one of the best buys among minivans today. |
|
Overview:
|
Most people associate the Mercury nameplate with large and luxurious sedans such as the opulent Grand Marquis, or with rebadged Ford economobiles such as the Tracer. Canadians may recall seeing that name on the tailgates of pickup trucks until a few years ago, but that particular aberration never made it to America. Mercury product planners are as aware as anyone of what goes on outside their own domain, and the healthy sales of minivans led them to ask Ford for a van of their own. Which is exactly what they almost got. As it happened, Nissan was looking to move deeper into minivan territory with something more mainstream than its existing vans, none of which were doing big box-office at the time. To make a long story shorter, Nissan and Ford joined forces to produce the Nissan Quest and Mercury Villager, near-identical twins assembled in a Ford facility in Ohio using components from Nissan parts bins. One result of this venture is that the Villager started life with the Quest as a close competitor. Beyond that, all the Villager has to do is entice buyers away from such stalwarts as the Chrysler minis, Ford Windstar, Mazda MPV and others. A tall order. Nonetheless, the Villager enters the arena with some definite points on its side. It may not be the best minivan of all (though it would be difficult, if not impossible, to pick an absolute best buy), but it's certainly good enough to deserve careful consideration from most minivan customers.
Read the complete
1995 Mercury Villager review
|
|
© 2002 NewCarTestDrive.com
CARFAX does not review, validate or edit the information and statements provided by NewCarTestDrive.com, which do not represent the opinion of CARFAX.
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Unauthorized Usage Disclaimer
CARFAX DEPENDS ON ITS SOURCES FOR THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF ITS INFORMATION. THEREFORE,
NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED BY CARFAX OR ITS AGENTS FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THIS REPORT.
CARFAX FURTHER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
SYSTEMATIC RETRIEVAL OF THE CONTENT OR OTHER DATA FROM THIS SITE TO CREATE OR COMPILE,
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A COLLECTION, COMPILATION, DATABASE OR DIRECTORY
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CARFAX IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. THE CARFAX SAFETY &
RELIABILITY RATINGS IS SUBJECT TO THE CARFAX.COM
TERMS OF USE.
© 2008 CARFAX, Inc., an R.L. Polk & Co. All rights reserved.
|
Safety:
Reliability:
